Implementing Network QoS at AGLT2

Recently we have seen periods where our LANs have been congested and packets are dropped. This has resulted in some of the monitoring data we collect having gaps and (worse) some of the running jobs failing with lost-heartbeat failures.

Below is an example of the a congested link (the LAG on port-channel 19 between SW9 and SW16) and results on the Condor job monitoring.

To see if we can address this issue we want to prioritize traffic to/from the following service nodes:
  • umopt1.aglt2.org (Condor headnode) with private IP 10.10.1.3
  • gate01.aglt2.org (USATLAS gatekeeper) with private IP 10.10.1.11
  • gate02.grid.umich.edu (Grid gatekeeper for no USATLAS) with private IP 10.10.1.12
  • head01.aglt2.org (dCache headnode for all but namespace) with private IP 10.10.1.41
  • head02.aglt2.org (dCache namespace headnode) with private IP 10.10.1.45
The SW9 node is a Dell PowerConnect 8024F while the SW16 node is a Dell/Force10 S4810.

The relevant manual for QoS on the PC8024F is here

The relevant manual for QoS on the S4810 is here

Blade Networks application guide has decent discussion of QoS?, see attached AG and manual for g8124.

Lost Heartbeat Jobs

We seem to hit lost-heartbeat jobs when the network is congested. I explored one of them (see PANDA http://panda.cern.ch/server/pandamon/query?job=1538734258 ). The only log file I can find has the following information:

000 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 11:26:35 Job submitted from host: <130.199.54.60:58958> pool:ANALY_AGLT2 ...
017 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 07:26:46 Job submitted to Globus RM-Contact: gate01.aglt2.org/jobmanager-condor JM-Contact: https://gate01.aglt2.org:55788/2466831/1341401201/ Can-Restart-JM: 1 ...
027 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 07:26:46 Job submitted to grid resource GridResource?: gt2 gate01.aglt2.org/jobmanager-condor GridJobId?: gt2 gate01.aglt2.org/jobmanager-condor https://gate01.aglt2.org:55788/2466831/1341401201/ ...
001 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 07:31:49 Job executing on host: gt2 gate01.aglt2.org/jobmanager-condor ...
029 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 08:04:58 The job's remote status is unknown ...
030 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 08:13:45 The job's remote status is known again ...
005 (38513249.000.000) 07/04 12:07:54 Job terminated. (1) Normal termination (return value 0) Usr 0 00:00:00, Sys 0 00:00:00
- Run Remote Usage Usr 0 00:00:00, Sys 0 00:00:00
- Run Local Usage Usr 0 00:00:00, Sys 0 00:00:00
- Total Remote Usage Usr 0 00:00:00, Sys 0 00:00:00
- Total Local Usage

  1. - Run Bytes Sent By Job
  2. - Run Bytes Received By Job
  3. - Total Bytes Sent By Job
  4. - Total Bytes Received By Job

It seems this pilot picked up a second job after the original job failed. This second job finished OK (See http://panda.cern.ch/server/pandamon/query?job=1538746841 )

Configuring QoS? for SW9 and SW16

Using the information in the introduction above we will try to protect traffic to/from those critical servers.

It seems the simplest means of doing this is to setup the "source" network port to have the QoS? COS set. The critical servers are all VMware systems. I created a new network resource allocation called "AGLT2 Management Servers" and set the following attributes on it:

Physical Adapter Share: High

QoS? Priority Tag: 4

I had to enable "Overrides" for the Resource Allocation on the following port-groups: AGLT2, AGLT2_Private and Grid. I could then set the public and private "Resource Allocation" on the distributed vSwitch ports for the LFC, GATE01, GATE02, HEAD01, HEAD02 and UMOPT1 (Condor).

-- ShawnMcKee - 04 Jul 2012
  • Condor monitoring showing the impact of a congested LAG on SW9 port-channel 19:
    Condor_congested.png

  • Cacti plot of the traffice on LAG 19 on SW9 showing congestion:
    LAG19_congested.png
Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
LAG19_congested.pngpng LAG19_congested.png manage 37.5 K 04 Jul 2012 - 15:57 ShawnMcKee Cacti plot of the traffice on LAG 19 on SW9 showing congestion
Topic revision: r4 - 05 Jul 2012 - 15:00:55 - TomRockwell
 

This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback